3Dwarrior
SOCIAL:
Filed under: 6nm, arc, exclusive, Featured, GPU, Hardware, Intel A380, Intel ARC A380 GPU, News, Sticky

Exclusive: Intel Arc A380 GPU Official Benchmarks, Specs And Positioning

Intel’s Arc A380 discrete graphics card has last but not least launched in China at around the specific time frame we predicted and whilst a few of initial critiques have been posted, we hadn’t noticed a much more holistic overview however so resolved to attain out to some of our Chinese colleagues. We got our fingers on the formal data presented for the A380 GPU which tells the story of Intel’s first genuine discrete graphics card with tons of prospective.

Intel A380 GPU verdict: trades blows with the GTX 1650 & RX 6400 for now but will age like FineWine™ (ahem)

Let us start off with the specs 1st.

The Intel Arc A380 graphics card is designed on the TSMC N6 approach and is the company’s to start with discrete graphics card start. The genuine Chinese MSRP of the GPU is 880 Yuan but following VAT (17%) it will come out to just about 1030 Yuan. That explained – we expect the US MSRP to be closer to the post-VAT pricing in Yuan somewhat than the pre-VAT pricing. It has 1024 FP32 cores (each individual Xe main has 128 FP32 cores) and 6GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 16Gbps. Mated to a ninety six-little bit bus width, this results in a bandwidth of 192 GB/s – extra than sufficient for a card of its class. The TBP of the GPU is configurable in between 75W to 87W with the clock velocity correspondingly configurable in between two GHz to 2.35 GHz.

Apparently, Intel makes it possible for a “outside of 87W” possibility as well – which is probably what the personalized GPUs you have noticed so significantly are making use of to achieve clock speeds perfectly in excessive of two.35 GHz. The Intel Arc A380 GPU is for that reason a four TFLOP to  four.8 TFLOP GPU which merged with AI up-scaling tech like XeSS – need to be enough for the 1080p entry degree gaming phase. Right before we go any even further, in this article is the comprehensive block diagram of the Intel Arc A380:


Now let’s get to the juicy component. We have already seen benchmarks of six online games that were being leaked before and we can include at least 20 much more titles to that arena. With benchmarks, extra is generally far better and 32 is around agreed to be the level the place your info commences to get statistically significant. That reported, we ended up really impressed by how clear Intel is in its official guideline (as you will see down below). Very first, let us search at the check configuration:

All of the screening in the formal benchmarks was performed utilizing an Intel Core i5 12600k with 32 GB of 3200 MHz DDR4 RAM and Home windows eleven OS and a 4TB NVME SSD. Only the GPUs, ie the GTX 1650, RX 6400 and Intel Arc A380 ended up swapped concerning them. Tests was done practically a month again so its well worth noting that driver efficiency would nearly surely have amplified in the course of this time:

As we can see, the Intel Arc A380 trades blows with the AMD RX 6400 and (significantly less once in a while) with the NVIDIA GTX 1650. It basically beats the RX 6400 in Full War: Troy, Naraka Bladepoint, The Witcher 3 and F1 2021. Thinking about this is the official documentation, its actually pretty interesting that Intel did not existing a a single-sided tale about its impending GPU. Here is also where the story receives genuinely exciting. FineWine™ is a time period that AMD lovers and visitors of this web site would be really familiar with and was a common term to describe AMD’s ongoing submit-start driver advancement again in the times when it applied to be income-strapped and was the underdog.

Intel Arc A380 absolutely crushes even the RX 6500 XT in optimized synthetic workloads

What we are viewing below, in the same way, is really a great deal a FineWine™ situation. Allow for me to expand: the Intel Arc A380 absolutely crushes the GTX 1650 and RX 6400 in 3DMark’s TimeSpy benchmark and even beats the RX 6500 XT. So quite evidently, the hardware potential is proper there and only the software is lacking. It is crystal clear that the improvement staff must have optimized drivers for this artificial benchmark – and exhibits the accurate locked potential of the hardware. The factor we have to recall is that NVIDIA and AMD have both had many years to optimize the driver code for their GPUs though Intel commenced creating discrete GPUs just a few decades back (allows not get into the Larabee debate).

Centered on what we are looking at in 3DMark Timespy, the Intel Arc A380 (depending on how its priced in the US) could change out to be an absolute cut price for players. The onus is quite considerably on Intel to keep on to produce its motorists and deliver the effectiveness possible we are seeing here. Just after all, at the close of the day, all that issues is no matter whether Intel is ready to produce on its functionality for each greenback value proposition.


Compute workloads are when once more a blended bag when it comes to Intel Arc A380. It beats out both of those the GTX 1650 and RX 6400 handily in HandBrake and is a little bit worse than the GTX 1650 in DaVinci Resolve.

It is even doable that players in the NA and EU will see an advancement in efficiency when Arc discrete GPUs start in non-Chinese territories. Relying on how quickly Intel is in a position to improve the driver stacks for several game titles and how they price their Arc GPUs (131 USD would be a steal for the A380 but I suspect we will see an MSRP closer to 150 USD when it does launch in the US) – even 150 USD could be a opportunity gain thinking of it has the hardware to be just at the rear of the NVIDIA RTX 3050 – which is a $249 MSRP GPU. Intel XeSS will be the cherry on leading of the cake.

The write-up Exclusive: Intel Arc A380 GPU Formal Benchmarks, Specs And Positioning by Usman Pirzada appeared initially on Wccftech.